« Tide Gates and Flooding... | Main | Flood Forum II: A Taxing Situation »

Notes from the Flood Forum

Flood_forum_commissioners_lister

Photo right:  Darin Haupt and Wahkiakum County Commissioners listen to comments from the floor

Flood_forum_comment_1

Photo left:  Comments from audience

Notes from Proceedings:

 

( These are raw notes, typed as quickly as possible while trying to get in the gist of the proceedings. Any and all misquotes, misspellings and omissions are mine alone. )

Guests present: Over 30 community members. Mark Linquist, Dan Cothran and George Trott: Wahkiakum County Commissioners,  Tim Schmitz, Bill Ower; Diking District #5, Darin Haupt, Wahkiakum Conservation District

 

Gordon Calver, Chair: Wahkiakum County Fair and local landowner, Tom Bosch: Diking District and David Boyd of the Hancock group were invited, but did not attend. 

Normal meeting was suspended to present A Skamokawa Flood Forum 

Jessica opened the meeting, introducing the members of the panel. 

Meeting to gather information and explore possible solutions. First: identify problems. 

Our Diking District was most affected by the flood waters 

Wahkiakum Conservation Group has been working on some “best practices”. 

Presentation started with Tim Schmitz. On Board since 1996. At that time, no functioning tide gate in the district. By the end of 1996 one gate replaced, another 4 repaired, and as much maintenance as limited budget allowed. Tim viewed lower tidegate from highway during last flood.

 

History: natural stream bed was closed and water diverted to new channel in the 1940s.

Class A members of district “at risk”, Class B not at risk. Class A are taxed, B: not.

Tim recently hiked the area and found a serious breach near West Valley, took many photos. Believes the breach why so much water flooded. 

245 billion gallons of water due to 20 inches of precip. More water than system could accommodate. 

Lower tide gate is 6 foot.    

Wilson Creek also completely out of its banks. Beyond scope of Skamokawa district. Perhaps a watershed district should be formed. 

Quick Fix: Raise dikes? 

61 East Valley Road comment. “Timed water coming in. 7 feet in 24 minutes.”  (Sleepy Hollow). Have made comments to County. 

Another comment: water coming in from area of Kent Martin’s fills the lower valley before it can run off naturally or through existing gates and culverts. 

Comment from floor: After last flood went to diking district and county. Still want to know why problem has not been addressed. 

Linda Newton (Skamokawa, near Sleepy Hollow.) 3 major issues. Hill water drains to Sleepy Hollow, County Trench through their parking lot, designed to run water out the tide gate. Tide gate is not accommodating the amount of water. Lack of maint contributes to the problem. Water came from east side, county parking lot and up the valley, total four different directions. Was told they were above flood plain when house was lifted. 18 inches of water in the house. Have asked for four years for ditches to be cleaned out (ditches are county property). Does not want to ask for action any more. Feels that legal action must be next if there is no relief. 

Another comment from floor. Have observed non-functioning tide gates. 

Comment from floor. Culverts under county roads no longer sufficient for drainage. 

Comment from floor: Unable to build up near west creek. Told he could not build up: “Why?” 

Bill C. West Valley Creek. Didn’t get the water this time, not as much from West Valley this time. Tim Schmitz: Bridge on this road must be seen to, due to amount of water in most floods. 

Bill C. Large culverts let water run quickly out of fields, where previously water would somewhat slow down while draining through fields. 

Another comment: 6 to 3 feet of mud in the fields near Martins. 

Tim S. District needs to grow. (Wasn’t voted into this office) Many people in district have not been taxed for unknown period. Too little money in taxes. Does not buy two loads of rock. District may have been sufficient in the 1940s. Not now. Nothing now to stop water coming down West Valley. 

Another comment: Grew up in East Valley. Logging has contributed to problem. Creeks are silted up. Concurring comment regarding Dead Slough. Silted up. 

Joel Newton: Feasibility studies have been done on Slough. Permit process takes 2 years. Needs to be addressed before then. County need to fund solution and be paid back through taxes and grants. 

Another comment; (Quinn) Lets pay for the fix amongst ourselves. 

Tim: Used to be more infrastructure, but grants have replaced this public support of public infrastructure. Have to accept the grant/private funding and go with it. Tim can go to County for money but does not want to go outside the scope of ongoing studies for current fix. Middle Valley, Dead Slough has been looked at by Wah, Cons. District. Partnered with CREST. 

Darin Haupt. Background Forestry. Doing feasibility assessments. At this point set up and ran a Power Point presentation. Slides included maps and diagrams of the valley and Dead Slough area. Water quality, displaced fishers, Limiting factors/salmon recovery.  240 acre watershed. 2003 flood mitigation came into play.  Fish/Flood funding. Improve water quality and fish habitat. No intent to impact flooding. “Grossly underestimated area of bathtub.” 

Survey and design work is ongoing. Gathering data to design new structures (previously tide gates). Still looking for access to develop complete cross section imaging.  Dead Slough needs fresh water. Will model stream to determine flushing. Don’t want to throw money at current project if it floods you worse. 

Cross Dike could protect the town. Upgrade structure and dredge. 

Comment from audience: What about the mouth of the creek? Referring to failed dredging project.  “Outside the scope” (port district project) 

(Lower tide gate is 60 inches) Replace with two. Ability to close off. Pumps are not being considered at this time due to costs. (Perhaps for emergency) 

This study is still in the initial stage of assessment.    

Design map for area. Pointed out original confluence of West Valley and Skamokawa creeks.   

We now realize that scope needs to be expanded, more local participation needed. Presently 1.5 million project. Selling for fish recovery. The funding source available. 

Water flow, fish and sediment are currently are being monitored. (Sediment includes components of old DDT, chlorine etc.   

Water quality, Fisheries,  Flood mitigation, Landowner participation, Cost benefit/local match

Operation and maintenance. (Probably from diking district) 

Comment from audience: Dike at Kent Martins: even if it were 10 feet high, we still would have been hammered. 

Comment from audience: Problem here is flood. Need a more aggressive solution to the flood component of this scenario. 

Will apply in spring for project funds. But need to complete date collection, initiate permit review process. Assess alternatives, including community assessment. 

In short, mitigating flood hazards must be a more important component of the overall plan. 

Question: What kind of time line before work can start on Dead Slough etc.?

Some short term risk minimizing work can start perhaps in 2008. 

Question: More direct approach to flood issue needed, 

Comment: Cynda: district is not govt. Diking District is govt. Our only source of money has been from fish, direct flood relief is not possible. Hoping to get flood relief as a side benefit. 

Tim intends to work in conjunction with Conservation Dist. Perhaps tide gate improvement can commence earlier than the scope of the larger project. 

Comments: What about this coming February? Any funding possible? What can be done in the short term? Can people who love fish help our problem? 

Question: Why is funding for diking district so low? (Difficult to ask people for more taxes?) 

Comment: tax money cannot come in to fix before this February. 

Commissioner George Trott: Plan must be made and engineered before we can even apply for funding. Without a plan somebody could get sued. Funding from Salmon recovery is better than it has been, the project described here has a good chance of being funded. 

Tim: Can’t even get into the creek. Short term fix is probably a larger pump to be on-call. (Ferguson’s could be a source for diesel pumps: Bill Chamberlain) 

Dan Cothran: Grays River was funded. We funded dredging though ineffective. We also have a situation in the Elochoman. Not just this district. Limited flood control money. Gotta play the game with the Feds and these fisheries. We were blindsided be people asking us for money. We depend of the diking district. 

Comment: Why not CREST plan for tide gate now, put our own engineer, and go for the funding. 

Pete Ringin, County engineer: “A lot to do here, only can do so much, must stick be county priority list. Paperwork to capture federal funds is tricky. If not done right, they take your money. Won’t say no to volunteers to help with paperwork. 

Quinn: water over dike by tavern. Tim: water ran along dike. 

Question: Can debris behind dikes and gates be removed? Tim: Debris has been removed. Steel screen keeps debris out. (trash rack) 

Comment; If no county money, federal possible? Tim: mitigation plan. Might qualify for FEMA funds. “They’re on board for that”,  Doesn’t know about state money. 

Question: have you checked for emergency money. George Trott: State is waiting for possibility of Federal funds. Question is still pending. Can’t ask for money without a specific project. 

Question: Has this problem in Skamokawa been addressed specifically? 

Pete Ringin: Feds have looked at problem here. Pete is talking to FEMA people. 

Bill C; What do we have to do to expand the district? Tim: Should probably be a Watershed rather than a diking district. 

Jessica asked for show of hands of those who would be willing to be in district even if they are not now. Most raised. (20 or so of over 30 present) 

Frank Webb: Conflicts over coming up with an effective district. Cynda: Can we copy the work that Grays River has done?

Comment: Stuart Moonen. Help offered to Tim to enlarge district. 

Tim: A lot of paperwork for this district is missing. Again, in the short term, a pump is best solution. Would like to discuss water volume with Darin to determine pump size. 

Jessica: relayed comment from Kay re: patrolling the pumps. 


Comment: No key was available to open park gates to get back to patrol tide gates. Answer: Park property is locked to reduce vandalism. 

Jessica: Additional meeting soon for petitions and further discussion. 

At this point, meeting adjourned for coffee, cookies and post meeting discussions., 

Respectfully Submitted,
Kathleen Morgain,
Secretary

 

 

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In